|

|
|
Voyage Plans and Summaries
[back to voyage document index]
Franklin Voyage Summary No. FR08/2000
Title
The Continent-Ocean Transition of the Crust and Mantle across the North
West Shelf (Leg 2)
Itinerary
Depart Dampier 0700hrs Friday 22nd Sep, 2000
Arrive Dampier 0800hrs Monday 25th Aug, 2000
Principal Investigators
Dr Graham Heinson (Chief Scientist)
Adelaide University
Department of Geology and Geophysics
Adelaide SA 5005
Tel 08 8303 5377
Fax 08 8303 4347
Email graham.heinson@ adelaide.edu.au
Assoc. Prof. Antony White (Project Leader)
Flinders University
School of Earth Sciences
GPO Box 2100, Adelaide SA 5001
Tel 08 8201 2020
Fax 08 8201 2676
Email antony.white@ flinders.edu.au
Scientific Objectives
The north west margin of Australia includes the Pilbara Archaean shield,
the Phanerozoic Canning and Canarvon sedimentary basins and the Exmouth
Plateau. Geophysical measurements of magnetic and electric fields onshore
and offshore provide a means of imaging the crust and mantle structure
in terms of electrical conductivity. The principal aims of the project
are:
-
to determine crust-mantle structure and anisotropy across the continental
margin, from Archaean shield to ocean abyssal plain;
-
to investigate the Canning Basin conductivity anomaly across the
margin and its relationship to extensional faults imaged from deep-seismic
profiles of the Fitzroy Trough.
Cruise Objectives
Twelve seafloor magnetotelluric (MT) instruments (squares in Figure 1)
will be recovered from the seafloor deployments sites established from
the first leg of the cruise in August. The same instrumentation was recently
recovered off the coast of Eyre Peninsula (1998) and Gulf of Carpentaria
(1999) in a similar configuration, so we did not anticipate any logistical
difficulties.
Cruise Track
See Figure 1
Results
Twelve low frequency MT instruments were deployed in August 2000 along
a transect across the Exmouth Plateau, as detailed in Table 1.
| Site |
Instrument |
Latitude |
Longitude |
Depth (m) |
Data Type |
| EX1 |
Jonah |
17° 56.636' S |
113° 18.299' E |
1902 |
E and B |
| EX2 |
Quartet |
18° 07.598' S |
113° 37.840' E |
1819 |
B only |
| EX3 |
Charlie |
18° 18.491' S |
113° 57.724' E |
1549 |
E and B |
| EX4 |
Twosome |
18° 29.330' S |
114° 17.370' E |
1420 |
B only |
| EX5 |
Dodo |
18° 40.907' S |
114° 36.624' E |
1604 |
E and B |
| EX6 |
Tertius |
18° 51.190' S |
114° 56.620' E |
1732 |
B only |
| EX7 |
Horace |
19° 02.417' S |
115° 15.226' E |
1512 |
E and B |
| EX8 |
Solo |
19° 13.000' S |
115° 35.170 E |
542 |
B only |
| EX9 |
Igor |
19° 18.329' S |
115° 45.137' E |
314 |
E and B |
| EX10 |
Gonzo |
19° 23.647' S |
115° 55.139' E |
214 |
B only |
| EX11 |
Fuzzy |
19° 29.003' S |
116° 05.103' E |
132 |
E and B |
| EX12 |
Ernie |
19° 37.201' S |
116° 15.488' E |
104 |
E and B |
Table 1: Instrument site, name, location, depth and data. In the
last column, B stands for magnetic field data and E for electric field
data.
All instruments had an acoustic burn-wire release mechanism. We successfully
recovered eleven instruments, but EX7 (Horace) was lost. On deployment
in August, EX7 stopped responding while sinking at 1200 m depth and we
believe that the instrument probably flooded.
Instrument EX9 (Igor) was eventually recovered by dragging a cable on
the seabed in 300 m water depth. The acoustics were working, and acknowledged
the release code, but the instrument remained on the seabed. We suspect
that strong sea-bottom currents may have flipped the instrument upside
down soon after deployment, with the lead ballast on top of the instrument,
and hence the burn wire corroded, but the lead remained in place. On dragging,
the cable presumably knocked the ballast off, and we were able to track
EX9 to the surface. Recovery at night was somewhat complicated as the
instrument was upside down in the water and had no visual beacons. However,
acoustic ranging was maintained and we successfully picked up EX9 late
on the 24th September.
Table 2 below shows data retrieval so far, with an indication of quality.
| Site |
Instrument |
Depth (m) |
Data |
Quality |
Comments |
| EX1 |
Jonah |
1902 |
E and B |
Very good, 46 days of data |
|
| EX2 |
Quartet |
1819 |
B only |
|
|
| EX3 |
Charlie |
1549 |
E and B |
Very good, 46 days of data |
|
| EX4 |
Twosome |
1420 |
B only |
|
|
| EX5 |
Dodo |
1604 |
E and B |
Very good in E-field, 46 days of data.
Good in B-field with 16 days of data. No time drift for B-field. |
Magnetometer B-field sphere contained about
a litre of water that eventually shorted the power supply. |
| EX6 |
Tertius |
1732 |
B only |
|
|
| EX7 |
Horace |
1512 |
LOST |
LOST |
LOST |
| EX8 |
Solo |
542 |
B only |
|
B only |
| EX9 |
Igor |
314 |
E only |
Very good in E-field, with 46 days of data.
No B-field data, and flat battery. |
The flat battery suggests that magnetometer
B-field readings were off-scale, possibly due to instrument being
upside down. |
| EX10 |
Gonzo |
214 |
B only |
Good, but noisy at first, in B-field, with
46 days of data. |
|
| EX11 |
Fuzzy |
132 |
E and B |
Good in E-field, with 46 days of data.
Noisy in B-field for 46 days. |
Noise in B-field suggest instrument moved
with currents |
| EX12 |
Ernie |
104 |
E and B |
Good in E-field, with 46 days of data.
Noisy in B-field for 46 days. |
Noise in the B-field suggest the instrument
is moving with currents |
Table 2: Instrument site, name, depth and data quality. In the
last column, B stands for magnetic field data and E for electric field
data. Instruments at sites EX2, EX4, EX6 and EX8 have not yet been opened
to check data recovery.
Cruise Narrative
| Date |
Site |
Notes |
| 22/9 |
Dampier |
Departed Dampier at 0700 LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX12 (approximately 65
Nm. Weather very calm) |
| |
EX12 |
Recovered EX12 from 104 m depth with no
problems. On board at 1400 LT.
Instrument covered in sediment and marine growth, but otherwise
in good shape.
|
| |
|
Transit to site EX11 (approximately 14
Nm.) |
| |
EX11 |
Recovered EX11 from 132 m of water. On
board at 1700 LT. Some problems with communication to the instrument
due to significant noise.
Instrument covered in sediment (less than at EX12) but with one
broken plastic arm. All other instruments at depths greater than
200 m did not contain much sediment.
|
| |
|
Transit to site EX10 (approximately 11
Nm.) |
| |
EX10 |
Arrived at EX10 at about 1800 LT and enabled
top acoustics. However, decided not to release the instrument due
to sunset and lack of visual aids on the instrument. |
| |
|
Transit to site EX6 (approximately 66 Nm)
On the way we attempted to communicate with site EX7 at 1100 LT.
However, no response from the instrument was obtained.
|
| 23/09 |
EX6 |
Recovered EX6 from 1732 m depth. The instrument
had a flashing beacon and was easily spotted. On board at about 0200
LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX4 (approximately 44 Nm) |
| |
EX4 |
Recovered EX4 from 1420 m depth. On board
at about 0700 LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX3 (approximately 22 Nm) |
| |
EX3 |
Recovered EX3 from 1549 m depth. On board
at about 1000 LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX1 (approximately 44 Nm) |
| |
EX1 |
Recovered EX1 from 1902 m depth. On board
at about 1530 LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX2 (approximately 22 Nm) |
| |
EX2 |
Recovered EX2 from 1819 m depth. The instrument
had a flashing beacon and was easily spotted. On board at about 1900
LT |
| 24/09 |
|
Transit to site EX5 (approximately 66 Nm) |
| |
EX5 |
Recovered EX5 from 1604 m depth. On board
at about 0600 LT. Magnetometer sphere contained about 1 litre of water
that eventually shorted the power supply. Presumably the leak occurred
close to the surface on deployment and maybe during recovery. |
| |
|
Transit to site EX7 (approximately 44 Nm) |
| |
EX7 |
Did not recover EX7. We tried pinging with
the ship's 12 kHz transducer and with an over-the-side transducer,
without success. A small search box of between 0.5 and 1 Nm from the
instrument drop point failed to make contact. Abandoned the search
at 1120 LT. |
| |
|
Transit to site EX8 (approximately 22 Nm) |
| |
EX8 |
Recovered EX8 from 542 m depth. On board
at about 1400 LT |
| |
|
Transit to site EX9 (approximately 11 Nm) |
| |
EX9 |
Enabled top pinger and sent release code
at about 1500 LT. Waited for 1 hour for the burn wire to corrode,
but instrument failed to rise. We were unable to communicate with
the other independent instrument acoustic system, and presumed something
was wrong. Our guess at the time was that either the instrument was
stuck in sediments, or perhaps the magnetometer had flooded.
After another 20 minutes, the attempts were abandoned, and we decided
to pick up site EX10 in daylight if possible.
|
| |
|
Transit to site EX10 (approximately 11
Nm) |
| |
EX10 |
Recovered EX10 from 214 m depth. On board
at about 1800 LT.
The instrument showed significant signs of damage, including two
broken plastic arms. The indication was of very strong sea-bottom
currents moving the instrument about 250 m from the drop point location.
|
| |
|
Transit back to site EX9 (approximately
11 Nm) |
| |
EX9 |
Arrived back at the site at about 1900
LT. After a few attempts, we were able to communicate with both sets
of acoustics, and re-sent release codes. However, the instrument did
not change its range, indicating it was still on the seabed.
At 1945 LT, a cable was deployed on the seabed of depth about 300
m with an end grapple hook. Approximately 1200 m of cable was spooled
out in a circle around the drop point. After completing the circle,
the wire was winched back in, pulling the cable across the sea floor.
From the acoustic records, we were able to see the point at which
the wire hit the instrument, presumably knocking the ballast off.
The instrument rose to the sea surface upside down at about 2030,
and was recovered with the aid of the ship's spotlights. Acoustic
contact was maintained with EX9.
|
| |
|
Steam to Dampier (approximately 90 Nm) |
| 25/09 |
Dampier |
Arrived at 0800 LT |
Summary
The quality and distribution of geophysical instruments across the Exmouth
Plateau will provide us with a means of determining the deep geological
structure of this part of the North West Shelf. We anticipate being able
to produce a two-dimensional geophysical model of the region and compare
this with AGSO seismic data. In addition, the instruments are also sensitive
to oceanographic currents across the North West Shelf.
The data will be worked on by the Principal Investigators and we anticipate
that one Ph.D. student and a number of Honours students will also benefit
from the experiment.
Personnel
| Dr Graham Heinson |
Adelaide University |
Chief Scientist, geophysics |
| A/Prof Antony White |
Flinders University |
Project Leader, geophysics |
| Dr F.E.M. (Ted) Lilley |
ANU |
Geophysics |
| Dr Steve Blake |
BRS |
Oceanography & geophysics |
| Professor Karsten Bahr |
Universitaet Goettingen |
Geophysics |
| Dr Fiona Simpson |
Universitaet Goettingen |
Geophysics |
| Dr Debbie Thiele |
Deakin University |
Cetacean observer |
| Ms Rebecca Pirzl |
Deakin University |
Cetacean observer |
| Mr Ron Plaschke |
CMR |
Cruise Manager |
| Mr Lindsay Pender |
CMR |
Computing |
| Mr Eric Madsen |
CMR |
Electronics |
| Mr Neil Cheshire |
Master |
| Mr Arthur Staron |
1st Officer |
| Mr John Boyes |
2nd Officer |
| Mr John Morton |
Chief Engineer |
| Mr Rob Cave |
1st Engineer |
| Mr Hugh McCormick |
Electrical Engineer |
| Mr Steve Harris |
Greaser |
| Mr Bill Hughes |
Bosun |
| Mr Tony Hearne |
AB |
| Mr Terry Gamin |
AB |
| Mr Norm Irvine |
AB |
| Mr Ron Culliney |
Chief Steward |
| Mr Gary Hall |
Chief Cook |
| Mr Wayne Hatton |
2nd Cook |
Acknowedgements
Cruise FR08/00 on the RV Franklin was a great success. Losing one instrument
was a small disappointment, but expected given the number of deployments
made and the usual rate of loss of instrumentation in marine geophysics
(typically 5%). Recovery of the last instrument at EX9 with the seabed
cable and then picking the instrument up at night with no lights and only
acoustic contact was superb, and we are very indebted to the skill and
willing of the RV Franklin's Master and crew in the operation. Without
their efforts, this instrument would have been lost.
As always, the experience and expertise of the Master, Mr Neil Cheshire,
and the crew of the RV Franklin were much appreciated. Their cheerful
and friendly approach made recovery of instruments smooth and uneventful.
The CSIRO personnel (Mr Ron Plaschke (Cruise Manager), Mr Lindsay Pender
(Computing) and Mr Erik Madsen (Electonics)) were always helpful and co-operative,
and we are very grateful for their guidance throughout the cruise.
This cruise represented the third of a series of marine geophysical investigations
of the continental margin around Australia. In April-May 1998, we spent
a total of three weeks south of Eyre Peninsula, and in November-December
1999 another three weeks was spent in the Gulf of Carpentaria. In each
of the three experiments, the RV Franklin has been extremely suitable
for our needs. We are very grateful to the Franklin Steering Committee
and CSIRO Marine Research for time granted for the research projects,
and the various Masters and crews over the last three years.
Graham Heinson
Chief Scientist.
Figures

Figure 1: Cruise Track from Dampier to the 12 deployed instruments (squares)
across the Exmouth Plateau.
Updated: 31/01/03
|