Aim & Outcome of Study study background Where is Norfolk
Seamounts Marine Area?
Work Plan for StudyStakeholders The Research Team Contact us Project UpdatesHOME

Note: This project was finalised in March 2006 and is updated with new reports as they become available.

Project updates

>go to Current project updates

 

JULY/AUGUST 2004

  • Continued data collation
  • Documented replies/communication from the mail-out and followed up leads provided
  • Commenced report writing describing the physical environment and human uses
  • Continued development of the website
 

JUNE 2004

Sent out 70 letters to potential stakeholders and potential data holders in Australia, New Zealand and New Caledonia. In addition contacted the 37 scientists who are contributing to the NORFANZ survey results. Thank you to all who responded.

Commenced arranging access and collating data on:

  • Physical characteristics of the Norfolk Island EEZ - bathymetry, geomorphology, oceanography.
  • Human uses - shipping traffic, submarine cables, location of shipwrecks.
  • Location information on the use of the marine environment surrounding Norfolk Island - tour/charter operations, fishing.
  • Species lists of vertebrates and invertebrates from the Norfolk Ridge, the Norfolk Island EEZ and adjacent regions.
  • Threatened and listed species recorded from the region.
  • General information on the Norfolk Island Offshore Demersal Finfish Fishery (NIODFF).
 

May 2004

Meeting 10/5/04

The project team met with CMR scientist Dr Alan Butler and DEH representatives on the 10 May 2004, to discuss the extent of the study region and the criteria by which we will access conservation values.

The study region

Agreement was made on the extent of the study region >view study region.

Assessing conservation significance

The purpose of the study is to assess whether the Norfolk Seamounts marine area possesses biodiversity values worthy of protection.  The assessment should identify and describe any areas of high conservation value in the Norfolk Seamounts marine area and should provide an assessment of the conservation values of the area in accordance with the identification criteria as outlined in Guidelines for identification of MPAs detailed in the Strategic Plan of Action for the NRSMPA.

The relevance of two categories, Representativeness and comprehensiveness, needs to be assessed in relation to the provincial structure identified in IMCRA (IMCRA Technical Group 1998). IMCRA identifies the Norfolk province and divides it into three regions, Norfolk Province a - Norfolk Is; b - Lord Howe Is; and c - Middleton and Elisabeth Reefs (IMCRA Technical Group 1998). However, IMCRA is an inshore and shelf-based regionalisation, thus its relevance to the present CVA needs to be examined further. As mentioned above, we intend to compare data from the Norfolk Is region with data from seamounts in the general vicinity, including areas on the Lord Howe Rise.

The criteria under Ecological Importance are especially relevant and should be interpreted broadly

To determine Uniqueness we will compare faunal lists from studies in the Australian EEZ and others directly north/ south of the region in New Caledonia and north of New Zealand.

The point under Vulnerability Assessment in the Guidelines for identification of MPAs detailed in the Strategic Plan of Action for the NRSMPA only refers to natural processes. We aim to also identify the area's vulnerability to anthropogenic activities and processes in fulfillment of point 5. However we will not be providing a social impact study.

> Information that will be compiled for the study

Other outcomes for May

  • Drafted a letter [view letter as PDF] to contacts which CMR will post out to stakeholders.
  • CMR and DEH decided to draft a follow-up article for the local Norfolk Is paper to inform Norfolk Island residence of the website and an alternative form of contact/information.
  • Continued to identify relevant literature and data.
 

April 2004

Meeting 4/4/04

The project team met for the first time on 4th April 2004. The following were the outcomes of the meeting

  • began assembling a contacts list in consultation with DEH
  • commenced assembly of literature using a Procite database.
  • initiated website aims and design.
  • start to identify possible data sources
  • review of (conservation assessment metadata system (CAMS)) for data and lead management
  • identify relevant maps

Follow on from the meeting

  • CMR began to identify groups/ organisations and individuals which may have an interest or information/data on the region.
  • CMR assessed CAMS as a tool for lead management and identified changes to CAMS which would make the tool more useful. CMR programmers made the necessary changes to the software.
  • CMR drafted the text, maps and images for the website.
 

March 2004

CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research (CMR) was contracted by The Department of the Environment and Heritage (DEH) to undertake a Conservation Values Assessment (CVA) of the Norfolk Seamounts Region. CMR in consultation with DEH developed a work plan and began researching the background for the project.

 

Updated: 18/04/11

 

 

© CSIRO Australia.
Use of this web site and information available from it is subject to our Legal Notice and Disclaimer